Ten Year NFL Draft Case Study: ACC

YEAR BY YEAR BREAKDOWN

To start, here’s every player drafted from the ACC over the last ten years:

2012
ACC picks/total draft picks: 31/253 – 12.3%
ACC First Rounders: 3
Most by school: Miami (6)
Least by school: Duke, Maryland (0)
Most by position: LB (7)
Least by position: C, QB (0)

Players drafted by school:
Boston College: 1
Clemson: 4
Duke: 0
Florida State: 4
Georgia Tech: 1
Maryland: 0
Miami: 6
NC State: 5
UNC: 2
Virginia: 1
Virginia Tech: 3
Wake Forest: 4

Positions drafted from ACC/positions drafted total:
QB: 0/11
RB: 2/21
WR: 6/33
TE: 1/11
OL: 4/44
DL: 7/44
LB: 7/33
CB: 3/31
S: 1/19
K: 0/4
P: 0/2

2011
ACC picks/total draft picks: 35/254 – 13.8%
ACC First Rounders: 3
Most by school: UNC (9)
Least by school: Duke, Wake Forest (0)
Most by position: CB (7)
Least by position: C, S (0)

Boston College: 1
Clemson: 6
Duke: 0
Florida State: 3
Georgia Tech: 1
Maryland: 2
Miami: 8
NC State: 1
UNC: 9
Virginia: 1
Virginia Tech: 3
Wake Forest: 0

QB: 3/12
RB: 5/30
WR: 3/28
TE: 2/12
OL: 4/41
DL: 6/44
LB: 4/32
CB: 7/39
S: 0/14
K: 0/1
P: 1/1

2010
ACC picks/total draft picks: 31/255 – 12.2%
ACC First Rounders: 4
Most by school: Clemson, Virginia Tech (5)
Least by school: Duke (0)
Most by position: CB (5)
Least by position: G, QB (0)

Boston College: 1
Clemson: 5
Duke: 0
Florida State: 3
Georgia Tech: 4
Maryland: 2
Miami: 4
NC State: 2
UNC: 2
Virginia: 1
Virginia Tech: 5
Wake Forest: 2

QB: 0/14
RB: 2/15
WR: 2/28
TE: 2/20
OL: 6/38
DL: 6/55
LB: 3/29
CB: 5/34
S: 4/19
K: 0/0
P: 1/3

2009
ACC picks/total draft picks: 33/256 – 12.9%
ACC First Rounders: 5
Most by school: UNC, Maryland (5)
Least by school: Duke (0)
Most by position: DT, LB (5)
Least by position: QB, G, C (0)

Boston College: 2
Clemson: 4
Duke: 0
Florida State: 1
Georgia Tech: 4
Maryland: 5
Miami: 1
NC State: 2
UNC: 5
Virginia: 4
Virginia Tech: 1
Wake Forest: 4

QB: 0/11
RB: 3/22
WR: 4/34
TE: 4/20
OL: 4/40
DL: 7/43
LB: 5/23
CB: 3/36
S: 3/21
K: 0/2
P: 0/3

2008
ACC picks/total draft picks: 33/252 – 13.1%
ACC First Rounders: 7
Most by school: Virginia Tech (8)
Least by school: Duke (0)
Most by position: DT (6)
Least by position: G (0)

Boston College: 3
Clemson: 2
Duke: 0
Florida State: 3
Georgia Tech: 3
Maryland: 1
Miami: 3
NC State: 2
UNC: 2
Virginia: 3
Virginia Tech: 8
Wake Forest: 3

QB: 1/13
RB: 1/27
WR: 4/35
TE: 1/16
OL: 5/40
DL: 11/45
LB: 5/27
CB: 2/30
S: 2/15
K: 0/2
P: 1/1

2007
ACC picks/total draft picks: 31/255 – 12.2%
ACC First Rounders: 6
Most by school: Clemson, Florida State, Miami (5)
Least by school: Duke, UNC (0)
Most by position: CB, LB, WR (4)
Least by position: QB (0)

Boston College: 2
Clemson: 5
Duke: 0
Florida State: 5
Georgia Tech: 2
Maryland: 2
Miami: 5
NC State: 3
UNC: 0
Virginia: 2
Virginia Tech: 3
Wake Forest: 2

QB: 0/11
RB: 2/24
WR: 4/34
TE: 1/13
OL: 8/41
DL: 4/43
LB: 4/33
CB: 4/30
S: 3/20
K: 0/3
P: 1/3

2006
ACC picks/total draft picks: 51/255 – 20%
ACC First Rounders: 12
Most by school: Virginia Tech (9)
Least by school: Duke (0)
Most by position: LB (9)
Least by position: G (0)

Boston College: 3
Clemson: 3
Duke: 0
Florida State: 8
Georgia Tech: 3
Maryland: 3
Miami: 9
NC State: 6
UNC: 1
Virginia: 5
Virginia Tech: 9
Wake Forest: 1

QB: 1/12
RB: 4/17
WR: 3/33
TE: 3/16
OL: 7/51
DL: 10/45
LB: 9/31
CB: 8/23
S: 4/26
K: 1/2
P: 1/2

2005
ACC picks/total draft picks: 36/255 – 14.1%
ACC First Rounders: 5
Most by school: Florida State (9)
Least by school: Duke, Georgia Tech (0)
Most by position: CB (6)
Least by position: QB, C (1)

Clemson: 3
Duke: 0
Florida State: 9
Georgia Tech: 0
Maryland: 2
Miami: 5
NC State: 3
UNC: 3
Virginia: 7
Virginia Tech: 3
Wake Forest: 1

QB: 1/14
RB: 3/26
WR: 3/31
TE: 3/9
OL: 7/49
DL: 5/35
LB: 4/36
CB: 6/29
S: 4/20
K: 0/3
P: 0/2

2004
ACC picks/total draft picks: 25/255 – 9.8%
ACC First Rounders: 1
Most by school: Florida State, Georgia Tech, Maryland (5)
Least by school: Wake Forest (0)
Most by position: WR, LB (4)
Least by position: C (0)

Clemson: 2
Duke: 1
Florida State: 5
Georgia Tech: 5
Maryland: 5
NC State: 3
UNC: 3
Virginia: 1
Wake Forest: 0

QB: 2/17
RB: 2/18
WR: 4/32
TE: 1/16
OL: 4/43
DL: 4/47
LB: 4/28
CB: 1/28
S: 3/20
K: 0/3
P: 0/3

2003
ACC picks/total draft picks: 17/262 – 6.49%
ACC First Rounders: 1
Most by school: Florida State (6)
Least by school: Duke, Georgia Tech (0)
Most by position: WR (4)
Least by position: QB, TE, C, CB,  (0)

Clemson: 2
Duke: 0
Florida State: 6
Georgia Tech: 0
Maryland: 1
NC State: 2
UNC: 1
Virginia: 2
Wake Forest: 3

QB: 0/13
RB: 1/23
WR: 4/36
TE: 0/14
OL: 4/45
DL: 4/49
LB: 3/30
CB: 0/30
S: 1/18
K: 0/1
P: 0/2

YEAR BY YEAR BREAKDOWN: A full breakdown of the last ten drafts from an ACC perspective. (Page 2)

POSITIONAL BREAKDOWN: Which positions in the ACC get picked early? (Page 3)

SUCCESS/BUST BREAKDOWN: Which schools produce the most busts? (Page 4)

NCAA SCHOOL BREAKDOWN: Which schools perennially produce the top prospects? (Page 5)

NFL TEAM BREAKDOWN: Which NFL Teams like prospects from the ACC? (Page 6)

Continue to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: ACC, Ras-I Dowling, Ten Year Conference Case Study

4 Responses to “Ten Year NFL Draft Case Study: ACC”

  1. Prefectly Smart says:

    James, Nice work. As someone who has compiled similar data, I’m not sure everyone will appreciate the amount of effor that goes into such an undertaking.

    How did you treat players taken in the Supplemental draft? For example, Tony Hollings, RB from Georgia Tech, taken in the second round of the 2003 Supplemental draft by the Texans. Not that overlooking a few players is going to make any drastic shifts in the data, but in Holllings’ case it would erase the goose egg up on the board for GT in the 2003 draft.

  2. Patriots Draft Guru says:

    Patriots really haven’t had much luck from the ACC.

  3. John M says:

    How long will it take for Ochocincho jerseys to go on sale for $9.99 at Marshalls or TJ Max?






  • Categories

  • Search NEPD Archives

  • Archives