Return to 2010 NFL Draft: Scouting Reports

1.Carlos Dunlap, Florida (6-6/285)
Dunlap is a freak of nature in the Julius Peppers mold. He is stout enough to play 3-4 DE, but is ideally suited to a 4-3 rush DE. His physical gifts, however, mask his laziness and lack of work ethic in developing new moves. If he is properly motivated, he will be great. If not, he could easily be a big mistake.

Pros: Athleticism, Speed, Frame
Cons: Motor, Work Ethic, Off-Field Issues
Verdict: 1st Round

2. Derrick Morgan, Georgia Tech (6-4/270)
Morgan is a highly productive lineman that can play at right or left end. He isn’t good enough in coverage at this point to play anything but 4-3 DE — teams that envision him as a 3-4 OLB should stay away. Teams need to let Morgan do what he does best: set the edge, and apply pressure to the QB.

Pros: Athleticism, Speed, First Step
Cons: Playing in Space, Agility
Verdict: 1st Round

3. Everson Griffen, USC (6-3/270)
Griffen is a tough guy to evaluate. There are plays that make you think Top 10 talent, but there is lots of tape with Griffen loafing and getting dominated. Griffen is a versatile prospect though, having the skills to play 4-3 DE or 3-4 OLB, as he has great agility, balance and speed. He will need some coaching wherever he plays, as he doesn’t read plays very well yet.

Pros: Athleticism, Speed, Agility
Cons: Motor, Awareness
Verdict: 1st Round

4.Jason Pierre-Paul, South Florida (6-6/260)
Although Pierre-Paul is still a very raw and inexperienced football player, teams will covet him for his ability to disrupt the offense on their side of the line of scrimmage. He still needs to up his repertoire of pass-rush moves, but his outstanding athleticism allows him to survive without them. Pierre-Paul has the versatility to play 3-4 OLB on the strong or weak side as well as DE.

Pros: Versatility, Speed, Athleticism
Cons: Raw
Verdict: 1st Round

5. Brandon Graham, Michigan (6-1/265)
Graham plays the game hard every play and loves to compete. His pass-rush repertoire is without equal in the college game. Graham can play a bit in coverage, so will get a look from some 3-4 teams needing someone to play OLB or maybe SILB. Graham is relatively short, so will get engulfed at times by huge linemen.

Pros: Motor, Versatility, Pass Rush, Hands
Cons: Size
Verdict: 1st-2nd Round

6. Greg Hardy, Ole Miss (6-4/270)
Hardy had a sudden presence on the football field. He gets to the quarterback so quickly, that teams that want Hardy to play 3-4 DE will have a tough time assigning him to coverage duties. Hardy’s relentless pass-rush will be a great fit for a team needing a right end, as Hardy is better with a hand on the ground. Hardy could improve his ability to set the edge, get stronger, and show teams that he can stay healthy.

Pros: First Step, Explosive, Speed
Cons: Size, Strength, Injury History
Verdict: 1st-2nd Round

7. Corey Wootton, Northwestern (6-7/280)
Wootton will be a great 3-4 DE if he can show that he is fully recovered from a knee injury that hampered him in the early part of the season. When 100%, Wootton is a disruptive force on the line, setting the edge well against the run. Wootton isn’t a huge sack guy, but does apply consistent pressure to the QB.

Pros: Versatility, Strength, Agility
Cons: Injury History,
Verdict: 2nd Round

8. Jermaine Cunningham, Florida (6-3/250)
Cunningham is built like a prototypical rush end that isn’t horrible against the run. His quickness/agility allows him to run at linemen from a variety of angles. He has had some injury/off-field issues, but those seem to be in the past.

Pros: Agility, Speed
Cons: Strength, Off-Field Issues
Verdict: 2nd-3rd Round

Return to 2010 NFL Draft: Scouting Reports

1. Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska (6-4/300)
Suh embarrassed linemen on a weekly basis during the college season — only being bested by Texas Tech’s Brandon Carter. His incredible balance and functional strength make him a nightmare to block one on one. Can disrupt both the run game and the passing game. Will fit best as a 4-3 DT.

Pros: Speed, Strength, Technique, Motor
Cons: None
Verdict: Top 3

2. Gerald McCoy (6-4/300)
McCoy is a near-equal for the talented Mr. Suh. He really has no holes in his game, while being able to disrupt offensive plays seemingly at will. Has a good repertoire of pass-rush moves. Will be a great 4-3 DT.

Pros: Speed, Strength, Technique, Motor
Cons: None
Verdict: Top 5

3. Dan Williams, Tennessee (6-2/325)
Able to win at the point of attack due to his sheer power, Williams hasn’t developed a good set of rush-moves. He is constantly doubled on run plays, but is still able to get in on tackles. Best suited for the 3-4 NT position, but could play 4-3 DT.

Pros: Size, Strength, Anchor
Cons: Moves, Motor
Verdict: 1st Round

4. Brian Price, UCLA (6-2/300)
Price is an enigma. He is absolutely dominant for stretches of a game, but then will disappear. Often times, he can out-quick an OL and disrupt the play, but if the blocker latches on, Price just goes along for the ride. He will have to up his ability to shed those blockers in the NFL. Could play either 4-3 DT or 3-4 DE.

Pros: Disruption, Quickness, Strength
Cons: Consistency, Shedding
Verdict: 1st-2nd Round

5. Jared Odrick, Penn St. (6-4/295)
Probably will find he fits best as a 3-4 DE, but he will need to add a little bulk. The bulk will help him stand firm against the run, although his upright technique sometimes hurts him their too.

Pros: Motor, Speed, Disruption, Hands
Cons: Off-Field
Verdict: 1st-2nd Round

6. Terrence Cody, Alabama (6-4/370)
Mount Cody is a huge man that will anchor well against the run and demand a double team. Probably only a two-down player, as Cody doesn’t generate much of a rush. Gets winded easily, and will need rotation. Best suited as a 3-4 NT.

Pros: Size, Anchor
Cons: Motor
Verdict: 1st-2nd Round

7. Arthur Jones, Syracuse (6-4/295)
Though best suited as a 3-4 DE as he has trouble keeping his 295 pounds, Jones could also be an option for a 4-3 DT spot. Jones is a disciplined player that can firm up well against the run. He disrupts run plays on a consistent basis.

Pros: Strength, Disruption
Cons: Size, Injury History
Verdict: 2nd-3rd Round

8. Vince Oghobaase, Duke (6-5/305)
Vince is a big man that plays like he was 30 pounds lighter. He needs to improve his ability to shed blockers and make secondary plays. Could play as a 4-3 DT or a 3-4 DE.

Pros: Size, Agility
Cons: Shedding
Verdict: 3nd-4th Round

9. Tyson Alualu, California (6-2/295)
Alualu is a good fit for a 4-3 DE, but he could be used in sub-packages for a 3-4 team. Tyson just doesn’t quit on plays, and disrupts due to his sheer will. Has a good bull rush, but could use a better repertoire of moves.

Pros: Motor, Quickness
Cons: Length, Size
Verdict: 3rd-4th Round

10. Geno Atkins, Georgia (6-1/295)
Atkins is a player that has trouble wrapping up in the run game, although he does manage to put pressure on the QB consistently. Not tall enough for some scouts.

Pros: Pass-Rush, Quickness
Cons: Tackling, Size
Verdict: 3rd-4th Round